It is expedient to consider and staticize increase in economic solvency of the poultry-farming enterprises within the structured quality management system. In the course of the research the system, structural and comparative analysis, a method of groups and also a method of a graphic illustration have been applied. Changes of the key technical and economic and financial performance depending on effectiveness, the adapted quality management system at the poultry-farming enterprises are revealed. Systemically - the integration effectiveness of a research has allowed to define the positive efficiency promoting increase in economic solvency of economic entities of branch and, first of all, to provide release of safe poultry-farming production of stable quality due to system monitoring at all production phases of production, to strengthen trust of consumers to quality and safety of products.
The purpose of this article is development of conceptual model of use of the mechanism of public-private partnership for development of infrastructure ensuring the Russian market of agricultural machinery. The research methodology is based on application of system approach to studying of the social and economic phenomena and processes. As a result of carrying out a research by authors the conclusion is drawn that now the Russian market of agricultural machinery occupies an insignificant share in structure of sources of formation of GDP of Russia and is in a condition of crisis. Infrastructure ensuring the market of agricultural machinery not fully satisfies requirements of the business operating in this market. The current volume of investment isn't enough for maintenance of infrastructure ensuring the Russian market of agricultural machinery in current state. Insufficiently intensive use of opportunities of the mechanism of public-private partnership because of what the main investment loading lays down on the state having strongly limited investment potential in the conditions of deficiency of the consolidated federal budget is a serious problem and the main reason for deficiency of investment resources for full development of infrastructure ensuring the Russian market of agricultural machinery. The mechanism of public-private partnership allows not only to lower investment loading of the state, but also to provide financing of infrastructure ensuring the Russian market of agricultural machinery in full volume due to attraction of private investments that is a powerful argument for expansion of his use in this direction. For this purpose authors have developed and presented conceptual model.
In the article problems and prospects of development of the market of meat and dairy products are considered. A dynamic analysis of the production of meat and dairy products at the regional level has been carried out. Based on a two-sample F-test for variance, the presence of a trend in the time series was checked; On the basis of the analysis of the autocorrelation function, the presence of seasonal and cyclic components of time series was verified; Based on the analysis of the residual models for randomness, independence and normality, the adequacy of the constructed models is checked. As a result, a forecast was made for the production of meat and dairy products for 2017-2019, the errors in the approximation of which fell within the range from 7.5 to 10.85‰. The problems connected with the development of enterprises of the agrarian sector of the economy are considered.
Due to the unstable state of economic activity in the agroindustrial complex in the conditions of internal and external market, we will present the results of the study of technological development of the main type of raw materials in agriculture - production of meat and meat products. The necessity of supply of the Russian population with quality food is important, in this regard, the implementation of the Federal law "About agriculture development" the Russian Government approved the State program of development of agriculture and regulation of markets of agricultural products, raw materials and food for 2013 - 2020 (Government Resolution of the Russian Federation of 14 July 2012, No. 717). To increase the efficiency of productivity in meat and product sub-sub-complex, while maintaining the biological value of meat and meat products of the technological development of enterprises of the Krasnoyarsk territory is a priority. An objective assessment of the technological state of the industry will make it possible to make changes to the strategy for the development of the meat subcomplex of the region. Specialized farms on reproduction, rearing and fattening of pigs, i.e. pig complexes, consist of a full cycle of production. Meat and product sub-sub-complex includes a complex structure of processing, service and trade, public catering. In the article we consider the existing state of meat processing in the Krasnoyarsk region, with a proposal for the development of feed production.
The state and prospects of economic development of agricultural producers largely depend on the conditions of purchase of means of production and sale of manufactured products. In the Russian Federation, price dynamics are unstable. In the period 2015-2016, the ratio of price indices of the II and I agribusiness sectors was at 0.99, i.e. there was a slight imbalance. In 2017 there has been a significant deterioration in price ratios: prices for agricultural products decreased by 2.3‰, while prices for industrial products rose 7.6‰. member States of the EAEU faced with a similar problem. The calculation of parity ratio of prices revealed that the most favourable situation for agricultural producers among the countries of the Union has developed in the republics of Belarus and Kazakhstan. This is also evidenced by the comparison of the exchange value of wheat produced and purchased diesel fuel. The article also analyzes the ratio of producer prices of agricultural products and consumer prices, which showed an unfavourable ratio for agriculture in each of the member States of the EAEU. Based on the analysis of the US experience in the regulation of price relations in agriculture proposed measures to improve price relations in agriculture of Russia and the EAEU member States.
Implementation of integration processes is often accompanied by complex methodological problems, on the decision of which the success of economic interaction of states largely depends. Accordingly, the responsibility for possible errors or miscalculations is great. Therefore, the value of the correctly chosen methodology is very large. The combination of complexity and high responsibility of strategic decisions makes this area of research particularly relevant and significant. A competent methodological justification for the solution of these problems becomes especially important in the transition to a more advanced and deeper stage of integration - the economic union. This justification is closely related to the customs effects that result from integration processes and which require comprehensive evaluation, systematization and accounting when making managerial decisions within the framework of the tasks of implementing agreed policies at the level of various branches of the economic union. Effective integration of the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) in the agro-industrial complex today is one of the main tasks of the coordinated agro-industrial policy, the concept of which is determined by the decision of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council at the level of the heads of state of May 29, 2013, No. 35. At the same time for the period from 2013 to 2018 a large number of external factors appeared, manifesting themselves through new customs effects, which, in a serious way, can affect the effectiveness of the implementation of this decision. One such effect is the result of the sanctions policy at the national level in the context of the implementation of the principles of the unity of the customs territory within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union. The article makes an attempt to define the term "Customs effect" and to reveal the mechanism of its impact on the agrarian and industrial complex of Russia in the conditions of unity of the customs territory of the Eurasian Economic Union.
The article discusses the state support of agriculture in modern conditions, as is known from its effectiveness will depend on the level of food security, economic efficiency of agricultural production, the pace of its development, the state of rural areas. State support in the field of agricultural insurance is aimed at stimulating agricultural producers to use the insurance mechanism as a protection of their property interests in the loss of agricultural products, as well as minimizing the direct costs of the state to compensate for damage from natural disasters in emergency situations. It is worth emphasizing that 15.2 billion rubbles were allocated from the Federal budget. on reimbursement of part of the interest rate on investment loans (loans) for the development of crop production, as well as processing and development of infrastructure and logistics of crop production markets. Approximately 60‰ of subsidies on investment loans granted for the development of crop production were received by enterprises and organizations of the Central (37‰) and Volga (23‰) Federal districts. At the expense of the Federal budget, the financing plan was implemented by 98‰ and the funds of the regional budgets - by 92‰. Much attention is paid to the forms and instruments of state support for the agricultural sector: -direct (direct budget payments), - indirect (stimulating budget), - indirect (organizational and economic activities). To ensure availability and mass availability of agricultural insurance with high recoverability of losses as a result of effective use of budgetary funds should be the main goal of the state support of agricultural insurance.
In article the analysis of dynamics of the indicators characterizing financial support of the agricultural organizations is carried out. It is revealed that 76‰ of total amount of the allocated funds for support of small and medium business in the Tyumen region are the share of department of agrarian and industrial complex. The analysis accounting the otchetnostiselskokhozyaystvennykh of the organizations, recipients of the state support, confirms that costs of production of the enterprises of this branch occupy a considerable part of revenue. At the same time, for some enterprises the prime cost exceeds revenue. The hypothesis that use of the state help by the enterprise on modernization and material security, allows to increase more production efficiency that in turn, increases efficiency of use of means of the state support is made. It is offered to calculate efficiency of the state support, using the corrected relative indicator reflecting dynamics of volume of the received subsidies for unit of the made production. Results of calculation and also the analysis of structure of use of means of the state help the dependence between the volume of the subsidies directed to capital investments and efficiency of use of these subsidies and also economic indicators of the enterprise allows to draw a conclusion on existence of a straight line.
Reforming of agriculture has led to elimination or decrease in load of capacities of the enterprises I and III of spheres of agro-industrial complex and up to 140 industrial branches connected with the village. With destruction of industrial potato growing and vegetable growing to 90-93‰ of the areas in Russia are engaged today with small farms with which don't work the overworking plants, retail chain stores that leads to their leaving from the market. However small farms deliver more than 50‰ of all agricultural products on the market of the country. It is offered to create highly effective "Scandinavian" agricultural production and trade cooperatives (instead of procuring), like the Bryansk potato cooperative "Proizvoditeli i pererabotchiki kartofelja" with own seed farming, commodity production, storage, processing, packing and realization of potatoes. On the remained 7-10‰ potato and vegetable areas of Russia occupied with averages and large agricultural organization it is expedient to create the agro-industrial enterprises (like "state farm - the plant" - CJSC Ozyory) and associations of holding type ("Dmitrovsky ovoshhi" of the Moscow region). It is possible to use the Chinese model of economic transformations, but with the Russian specifics. It is offered to develop at the same time 3 spheres of agrarian and industrial complex and its main highly profitable and export-oriented subcomplexes with connection of designers and specialists of defense industry complex.
The market analysis of the agricultural equipment is presented in article. The economic analysis of potential development of Russian agricultural mechanical engineering is carried out taking into account policy of import substitution and opportunities of its expansion. Market segmentation of agricultural machinery from the point of view of development by Russian producers is made. The main competitive advantages of the domestic equipment are marked out: rather low price, availability of service, possibility of independent repair, protectionist policy of the state. Competitive advantages of the equipment made in foreign countries are reliability, productivity. The agricultural Belarusian machinery differs in the low price and protectionist policy of the government, holds a dominant position in structure of sales. Production of agricultural machinery, both the Russian samples, and foreign with high localization can be considered as a solution of the problem of formation of export-oriented agricultural mechanical engineering. The forecast of development of agricultural mechanical engineering and its export potential is offered. The main directions of development of the market of agricultural machinery as key element of the organizational and economic mechanism of technical modernization of branch are proved. Export growth is possible on the following segments of the market: combine harvesters, tractors with power more than 300 hp, the soil-cultivating equipment, the sowing equipment, complexes for storage and purification of grain, the forage hook-on equipment.