Яндекс.Метрика

INTERSECTORAL DISTRIBUTION OF BUDGET SUPPORT IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT-PROCESS APPROACH


DOI 10.33305/215-38

Issue № 5, 2021, article № 4, pages 38-43

Section: Economic mechanism of managing

Language: Russian

Original language title: МЕЖОТРАСЛЕВОЕ РАСПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ БЮДЖЕТНОЙ ПОДДЕРЖКИ ПРИ РЕАЛИЗАЦИИ ПРОЕКТНО-ПРОЦЕССНОГО ПОДХОДА

Keywords: BUDGET SUPPORT, PROGRAM ACTIVITIES, PRIORITY INDUSTRIES, PROJECT-PROCESS APPROACH, STRUCTURAL CHANGES

Abstract: An analysis of the results of programme activities for 2008-2020 is presented. Changes in approaches involving state financial support for agriculture are being considered. Structural changes in the state support system have occurred in the development of agricultural production. A significant reason was the transition from sectoral subsidies to aggregated support measures (the introduction of a "single subsidy"). It is noted that the program-targeted approach did not fully take into account the changes taking place in agriculture under the influence of technological transformation, so the emphasis gradually began to shift to project-process management of the industry, including projects and target programs that determine the vector of state support for the next five years. In addition to the main directions and activities, new or independent subprogrammes were included in the second State Program. New areas of state support appeared or they stood out as independent subprogrammes. In subsequent years, the situation began to change towards a decrease in subsidized activities: their number decreased from 49 to 11. Based on the analysis of structural shifts in the intersectoral distribution of state support, a negative dynamics was determined, the reason for which was the transition from direct measures to support agricultural producers (subsidies for the development of crop production, livestock production) to measures to support the industry as a whole and social infrastructure. At the same time, there has been no significant structural change in the volume of direct support, but it has led to changes in measures for the social development of rural areas.

Authors: Rodionova Olga Anatolevna, Pertsev Aleksandr Aleksandrovich